Maybe you have considered getting an exciting wireless office? Do you consider it’s not possible at this timeOr it’s not practical? In case your response to that real question is yes, you will want to see this short article without a doubt.

Let’s explore overturn situation first: What could be the benefits of wired systems over wireless systems? Well, the immediate points which comes to the mind may be the following:

  1. Speed. Wireless systems are regarded as slow and getting a minimal bandwidth.
  2. Real-time applications. Wireless systems cannot handle real-time applications like voice and video.
  3. Security. The wireless signals achieve even over the road. Let’s say someone hacks directly into my network?
  4. Incompatibility: Certain devices like printers etc. aren’t Wi-Fi enabled. Laptop Computer doesn’t have Wi-Fi cards.

Let’s explore each point individually (I’m penning this article in the purpose of look at a companyOrworkplace network, and therefore I’m presuming the Wi-Fi network is made using Wireless Controllers, Access Points and Keeper)


Wired systems were built with a decent speed of 100 Mbps which days possess a speed of 1000 Mbps. Wireless systems have only a speed of 54 Mbps which too is shared among many users.

Produce one application which may occupy 1000 Mbps per port, or perhaps 100 Mbps per port after which most likely I possibly could accept the above mentioned statement. The truth is, even when your workplace runs demanding applications like multimedia, ERP, video etc, the utmost bandwidth requirement per user might not mix even 4 Mbps! Now go ahead and take 54 Mbps of Wi-Fi systems and think that 15 individuals are connecting into it, each user could get around 2.5 Mbps, that is sufficient for the majority of the applications we have today, and when all of the 15 users don’t connect simultaneously, just one user could easily get much more bandwidth. Actually, using the creation of 802.11n standard for Wi-Fi, the bandwidth available per entry way is about 300 Mbps and can touch 600 Mbps soon. So, even when 15 people interact with one 802.11n entry way, they may get more than 20 Mbps, that is greater than sufficient for the majority of the applications around the network today.

Real-time Applications:

Let’s say I run PC based interactive video within my company? Can the wireless systems handle real-time traffic?

A good interactive video client might not take greater than 256-384 Kbps for giving 30 f/s quality video with H.264 compression. The number of such conferences are likely to happen concurrently? And real-time applications run perfectly in case your wireless controller supports WMM – Wireless Multi Media protocol which prioritize the actual time traffic within the normal traffic, and the majority of the controllers today support it. Even voice is supported around the wireless LAN – such as the seamless handover in one AP to a different, if you’re transporting the VoWLAN handsets. There’s a fascinating technology that’s growing fast, that is known as FMC – Fixed Mobile Convergence where your IP Phones and Mobile phones could be integrated having a single mobile handset and you’ve got one number for. Though IP Landline Phones aren’t based on Wireless Systems, such innovations (Like FMC and VoWLAN handsets for voice-over wireless LAN) help include capabilities in addition to provide the fundamental service a lot more efficiently.